ArticleRare tumors2025
Fungating testicular germ cell tumours: Case report and narrative review of clinical presentation and management strategies.
Article in Rare tumors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fungating testicular germ cell tumours represent a rare and extreme manifestation of neglected testicular cancer. These cases typically arise after significant delays in presentation, reflecting advanced local disease and, in many instances, concurrent metastatic spread. We present the case of a 41 year-old man with a year-long history of a progressively enlarging, ulcerated scrotal mass. Biopsy confirmed seminoma without evidence of metastasis. Given the extent of local disease, the patient received neoadjuvant etoposide-cisplatin chemotherapy, resulting in dramatic tumour regression. This facilitated a radical orchidectomy and wide local excision with primary closure and clear margins. He remains disease-free 12 months post-treatment. To better understand the management and outcomes of this rare presentation, a narrative review was performed, indentifying 19 comparable cases of fungating GCTs over the past 28 years. The median age at presentation was 36, with a median diagnostic delay of 6 months. Non-seminomatous subtypes, particularly embryonal carcinoma, predominated and carried a higher risk of metastasis. While upfront surgery was attempted in ten cases, it frequently required extensive resections and yielded positive margins. In contrast, six patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, leading to marked tumour regression in five, improved surgical outcomes, and no reported positive margins. These findings highlight the potential advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in managing extensive, locally advanced GCTs, even in Stage I disease. While concerns exist regarding infection risk in the setting of fungating tumours, these were not borne out in the reviewed cases. Multidisciplinary input is invaluable in optimising sequencing of therapy in such complex presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.