ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Olive Variety Classification and Prediction From 3D Morphology of Fruit and Stone: A Study Case on Five South Italy Autochthone Cultivars.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of the OliveID morphometric tool for the identification of archaeobotanical carbonized olive endocarps: evidence for morphological continuity with the modern Throumbolia cultivar.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Olive Variety Classification and Prediction From 3D Morphology of Fruit and Stone: A Study Case on Five South Italy Autochthone Cultivars.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate olive cultivar identification is critical for ensuring quality control and traceability in the olive oil industry. The International Olive Council (IOC) and the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) have established standardized protocols for varietal characterization. Over the past two decades, two-dimensional image analysis techniques have been increasingly employed for olive variety identification, utilizing various morphological parameters and machine learning approaches. This study investigates olive varietal classification through three-dimensional morphological analysis of fruits and stones using X-ray microtomography. The research evaluates the discriminative power of different trait combinations using both Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms to contribute to an optimized protocol for cultivar identification. Five autochthonous olive cultivars from the Campania region (Southern Italy) were analyzed. A preliminary comparison of classification performance between continuous and discrete morphological olive data revealed superior effectiveness of the continuous ones. Integrating quantitative morphometric traits with selected visual discrete UPOV characteristics yielded optimal overall classification accuracy of 88.41% using LDA with 84.4% for Ravece, 81.5% for Ortice, 100% for Frantoio, 81.3% for Rotondella, and 90.9% for Minucciola olive varieties. The best variety prediction rates, based on an olive sample not used for training, were provided by SVM, obtaining 70.0% for Ravece, 87.5% for Ortice, 54.5% for Frantoio, 60.0% for Rotondella, and 66.7% for Minucciola. Quantification of varietal overlap through Bhattacharyya coefficients identified Ortice and Ravece as the most phenotypically similar varieties, while Rotondella and Minucciola exhibited the most distinctive fruit morphology. Notably, all varieties showed at least one misclassification with the Frantoio variety. Morphological analysis demonstrated that endocarp surface traits provided the most discriminative power, and internal cavity characteristics also contributed significantly to varietal differentiation. These findings suggest two key implications: potential updates of UPOV guidelines for distinctness evaluation protocols and promising applications in authenticity verification for high-quality olive products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.