ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Determinants of Appropriate Complementary Feeding Practices Among Women With Children Aged 6-23 Months in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, children's feeding practices are a major public health concern. Evidence indicates that 90% of children receive less than the bare minimum of dietary content. In developing countries, only one out of five children under 24 months old receives the minimum recommended diet. This study utilized a weighted dataset of 24,235 from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted across eight Sub-Saharan African countries. The data preprocessing and analysis were performed using STATA version 17 and Python 3.10. Feature scaling was carried out using MinMax scaling and Standard Scalar, while feature selection was performed through Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE). An 80:20 data split ratio was applied, and class imbalance was addressed using Tomek Links combined with Random Oversampling. Eight models were selected and trained with both balanced and unbalanced datasets. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as ROC-AUC, accuracy, and the confusion matrix. The overall current feeding practice rate is 9.1%, with a Random Forest model achieving an accuracy of 91% and an AUC of 96%. The predictors for appropriate complementary feeding include current breastfeeding status, maternal education, wealth status, number of household members, sex of the household head, sex of the child, place of delivery, maternal employment status, and distance to the nearest health facility. In conclusion, the Random Forest model was effectively used to identify key determinants, revealing that appropriate complementary feeding practices are low. To improve this, we recommend enhancing community-based nutrition and reproductive health education, providing economic support for the poor, increasing access to healthcare facilities, and creating better opportunities to access smartphones and other social media platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.