ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Speak Up! Simulation Workshop: Teaching Graduate Medical Trainees to Recognize and Respond to Microaggressions in the Clinical Setting.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The negative effects of microaggressions on patient care, provider well-being, and medical education are well-documented. Critically evaluated programs addressing microaggressions remain largely absent in the literature. Methods: We developed the 90-minute Speak Up! Simulation Workshop for GME trainees (residents, fellows), physician attendings, other health care professionals (e.g., nurses, nurse practitioners, child life specialists) based on Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle. We utilized deidentified cases reported at our institution, emphasizing psychological safety and upstanding. Based on Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model, we distributed pre- and postworkshop surveys to assess perceptions of psychological safety, confidence in recognizing microaggressions, comfort in upstanding, and likelihood of addressing future discrimination incidents. Five-point Likert scales and Bowker's symmetry tests were used. Results: Eighty anonymous postworkshop surveys were collected from GME trainees ( Discussion: Evaluation of our curriculum demonstrated improved understanding of microaggressions and enhanced self-efficacy in upstanding. This simulation workshop provides psychologically safe opportunities to explore the impact of microaggressions and empowers participants to respond effectively in professional settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.