Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895116›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025

Dual strategies for epilepsy management employing pharmacological and non-invasive brain stimulation approaches.

Masoud Afshari, Gila Pirzad Jahromi, Mehrdad Roghani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masoud AfshariDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Gila Pirzad JahromiNeuroscience Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehrdad RoghaniNeurophysiology Research Center, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder that affects more than 50 million individuals worldwide, characterized by seizures, and is often associated with complications such as cognitive impairments, and an increased risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Despite advancements in pharmacological treatments, one-third of patients develop drug resistance and some experience serious side effects related to drug therapy. This highlights the urgent need for alternative therapeutic approaches. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS), have emerged as promising alternatives. These methods modulate brain activity with fewer side effects and show potential for treating drug-resistant epilepsy. However, their clinical application is still limited by factors such as variability in stimulation protocols and patient responsiveness. This review explores the efficacy, underlying mechanisms, and side effects of pharmacological treatments, with a focus on commonly prescribed drugs for epilepsy, as well as selected NIBS techniques, emphasizing their roles in managing epilepsy. By comparing these approaches, we aim to provide insights into optimizing epilepsy treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. This review suggests that NIBS alone or in combination with pharmacological therapy is a promising method for patients with epilepsy and future research should focus on the effective protocols and related mechanisms.

Indexed as

epilepsynon-invasive brain stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationtranscranial ultrasound stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40895116
PMCPMC12394041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.