ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
AI-driven cognitive telerehabilitation for stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Physical, Occupational and Neuro-Rehabilitation: Clinical Effectiveness, Prognostic Performance, and Pre-Implementation Feasibility - A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2026Pooled it
- AI-powered cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: a psychologist's lens on evidence and scalability in India.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- AI-driven telerehabilitation for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurologyTrial
- Self-directed and caregiver-assisted technology-based interventions in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: A scoping review.Clinical rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Efficacy of music-based telerehabilitation after stroke: protocol description of a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2026Article
- The Analytical Framework of Clinical Trials Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Artificial Intelligence-Based Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of market access & health policy · 2026Review
- Current State of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Stroke: A Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Novel Technology and the Internet of Medical Things.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Mobile Application-Based Interventions to Improve Attention in Stroke Survivors: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment is a common consequence of stroke, requiring effective rehabilitation strategies. Telerehabilitation has emerged as a promising alternative to in-person cognitive therapy, yet existing systems often lack mechanisms for real-time personalization and engagement monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a self-guided AI-driven cognitive telerehabilitation compared to a therapist-supervised rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients. Methods: In this multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, 63 participants with cognitive impairment within 6 months of stroke onset were randomized 1:1 to either a self-guided AI-driven telerehabilitation group or a therapist-supervised rehabilitation group. Both groups completed 24 sessions within 6 weeks using the same mobile platform. The primary outcomes were cognitive function measures, including the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination-2 (K-MMSE2), Trail Making Tests (A and B), and Digit Span Tests (forward and backward), with non-inferiority formally tested using the K-MMSE2. Secondary outcomes included functional independence, psychosocial measures and usability questionnaire. Results: Fifty-five participants completed the study. Both groups showed significant improvements across all primary cognitive measures, with no statistically significant differences between groups. Non-inferiority analysis confirmed that the self-guided AI-driven telerehabilitation was not inferior to the therapist-supervised rehabilitation based on K-MMSE2 changes. Usability assessment among users of the cognitive rehabilitation system indicated high overall satisfaction with no serious adverse events reported. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a self-guided AI-driven telerehabilitation can deliver cognitive improvements comparable to a therapist-supervised rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients. Clinical trial registration: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index/index.do, KCT0008969.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.