Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895105›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

AI-driven cognitive telerehabilitation for stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Suebeen Kim, Si-Woon Park, Taeksoo Jeong, Min-Soo Kang, Doo Young Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suebeen KimCollege of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Si-Woon ParkCollege of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.
Taeksoo JeongDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Min-Soo KangDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Seosong Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Doo Young KimCollege of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment is a common consequence of stroke, requiring effective rehabilitation strategies. Telerehabilitation has emerged as a promising alternative to in-person cognitive therapy, yet existing systems often lack mechanisms for real-time personalization and engagement monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a self-guided AI-driven cognitive telerehabilitation compared to a therapist-supervised rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients. Methods: In this multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, 63 participants with cognitive impairment within 6 months of stroke onset were randomized 1:1 to either a self-guided AI-driven telerehabilitation group or a therapist-supervised rehabilitation group. Both groups completed 24 sessions within 6 weeks using the same mobile platform. The primary outcomes were cognitive function measures, including the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination-2 (K-MMSE2), Trail Making Tests (A and B), and Digit Span Tests (forward and backward), with non-inferiority formally tested using the K-MMSE2. Secondary outcomes included functional independence, psychosocial measures and usability questionnaire. Results: Fifty-five participants completed the study. Both groups showed significant improvements across all primary cognitive measures, with no statistically significant differences between groups. Non-inferiority analysis confirmed that the self-guided AI-driven telerehabilitation was not inferior to the therapist-supervised rehabilitation based on K-MMSE2 changes. Usability assessment among users of the cognitive rehabilitation system indicated high overall satisfaction with no serious adverse events reported. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a self-guided AI-driven telerehabilitation can deliver cognitive improvements comparable to a therapist-supervised rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients. Clinical trial registration: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index/index.do, KCT0008969.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecognitive dysfunctionmobile applicationsstroketelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40895105
PMCPMC12391089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.