Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895061›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Market-approved convolutional neural network tasked with classifying skin lesions under suspicion of melanoma: performance across primary care clinics within Australia.

Ian J Miller, Michael Stapelberg, Jeremy Hudson, Paul Coxon, Nathaniel Milani, Nedeljka Rosic, James Furness, Joe Walsh, Mike Climstein

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ian J MillerAquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
Michael StapelbergAquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
Jeremy HudsonAquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
Paul CoxonAquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
Nathaniel MilaniNorth Queensland Skin Centre, Unaffiliated, Townsville, Qld, Australia.
Nedeljka RosicAquatic Based Research, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, Qld, Australia.
James FurnessWater Based Research Unit, Bond University, Robina, Qld, Australia.
Joe WalshSport Science Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mike ClimsteinPhysical Activity, Lifestyle, Ageing and Wellbeing Faculty Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to revolutionise how melanoma is detected in clinical practice, yet few studies have been published with patient data at the forefront. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the clinical performance of a market-approved convolutional neural network (CNN) to better differentiate skin lesions suspicious of being malignant melanoma (MM). A secondary aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the CNN across two separate general practices, that are skin cancer focused clinics. Methods: Multicentre, cross-sectional study using a commercially available CNN on 373 melanocytic lesions (114 melanoma, 259 non-melanoma) from participants attending a skin examination within two Australian specialised, general practice clinics. Performance metrics included sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, diagnostic odds ratios, accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) used for classification of images. Results: The CNN average sensitivity [Gold Coast Conclusions: Improvement of the performance of this CNN for the classification of images, particularly when suspecting MM is necessary before it may be used in a clinical setting in Australia. Other validated AI systems used internationally may also require review for use in an Australian setting.

Indexed as

MelanomaNeural Networks, ComputerSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAustraliaConvolutional Neural NetworksCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrimary Health CareROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceDermoscopyDiagnosticNevusSkin cancer

Identifiers

PMID40895061
PMCPMC12399074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.