Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895057›Full record

Observational studyPeerJ2025

Vitamin D supplementation in Saudi Arabia: mothers' knowledge, practices, and attitudes.

Hanan F Alharbi, Khulud Ahmad Rezq

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanan F AlharbiMaternity and Pediatric Nursing Department, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khulud Ahmad RezqCommunity and Psychiatric Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Despite abundant sunshine, vitamin D (VIT D) deficiency remains prevalent in tropical regions such as the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), largely due to limited dietary intake and sun exposure restrictions. This study evaluated mothers' perceptions of VIT D supplementation for them and their children in KSA. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted in KSA among mothers aged 18 and older with children under five years old. A convenience sampling method was employed to recruit participants in the study in the period from 31 July to 2 October 2022. The data were collected by developed questionnaire which was distributed to participants via WhatsApp and Facebook. The data were analyzed using an SPSS program with both descriptive and inferential statistical methods. Results: A total of 200 mothers participated, with a mean age (SD) of 35.48 (6.9) years. Among them, 66.40% had poor knowledge of VIT D and its supplementation, while 33.60% demonstrated good knowledge. Regarding practices, only 22.95% of mothers reported good practices, 43.85% reported fair practices, and 33.20% reported poor practices. However, most mothers (95%) demonstrated a favorable attitude toward VIT D and its supplementation, and only 5% of them showed a negative attitude. Notably, significant correlations were observed between mothers' salaries and their familiarity with VIT D ( Conclusion: The findings indicate that a significant proportion of mothers had poor knowledge and inadequate practices regarding VIT D and its supplementation, despite their generally positive attitudes. These results underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance knowledge and practices, considering socio-economic factors and educational background.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMothersVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultVitamin DAttitudeKnowledgePracticeSun exposureVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID40895057
PMCPMC12399081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.