ArticlePeerJ2025
Longitudinal changes in estimated glomerular filtration rates in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with Tenofovir Alafenamide
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review Article: Renal Safety Profiles of Tenofovir Alafenamide, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Entecavir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection-General and Special Populations.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Monitoring Adherence and Renal Safety of Nucleos(t)ide Analogs for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For individuals with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) at higher risk of nephrotoxicity, entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are recommended antiviral options. This study aimed to investigate kidney safety among treatment-naïve individuals with CHB receiving TAF versus ETV. Method: Treatment-naïve individuals with CHB receiving either TAF or ETV from July 2019 to December 2020 were included. Follow-up data on estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were collected. Factors related to chronic kidney disease (CKD) development were analyzed by Cox regression analysis. Generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was employed to investigate temporal eGFR changes and the association between the extent of follow-up eGFR change and antiviral agents. Results: 466 treatment-naïve individuals with CHB were included, with 296 in the ETV group and 170 in the TAF group. In the subgroup of individuals with a baseline eGFR higher than 90 mL/min/1.73 m Conclusion: The kidney safety profile of TAF among treatment-naïve individuals with CHB was comparable to that of ETV, without significant difference in developing CKD. Stratified analyses further revealed that TAF demonstrated superior kidney benefits compared to ETV specifically in males or patients aged over 35 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.