Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40895032›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2025

Pars screw fixation for symptomatic spondylolysis: A safe, cost-effective, and motion-preserving solution in resource-limited settings.

Moustafa A Mansour, Hamdi Nabawi Mostafa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moustafa A MansourDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt.
Hamdi Nabawi MostafaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Symptomatic spondylolysis is a debilitating cause of low back pain in young adults, often necessitating surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. While spinal fusion has been the traditional approach, direct pars screw fixation-pioneered by Buck in 1970-offers a motion-preserving alternative that may reduce long-term complications. Methods: This study evaluated the efficacy of Buck's technique in 14 patients (mean age: 26.5 years) with grade 0 spondylolisthesis and normal disc morphology, all of whom had failed six months of non-operative management. Surgical outcomes, including fusion rates, operative time, blood loss, and clinical results, were assessed. Results: The procedure achieved a 78.5 % fusion rate, with mean operative times of 40 min and blood loss under 100 mL, demonstrating technical efficiency. Clinically, 71.4 % of patients reported excellent or good outcomes at 18-month follow-up, with no neurological complications. Three nonunion cases were attributed to the learning curve and the use of lamina-derived grafts instead of iliac crest bone. The single poor outcome occurred in a patient with undetected disc degeneration, highlighting the importance of strict patient selection. Conclusions: Pars screw fixation is a safe, rapid, and cost-effective solution for symptomatic spondylolysis, particularly in resource-limited settings where operative time and implant costs are critical. Its ability to preserve spinal mobility while addressing the pain generator makes it especially suitable for young, active patients.

Indexed as

Buck's techniqueCost-effective spinal surgeryMotion-preserving surgeryPars screw fixationResource-limited settingsSpondylolysis repair

Identifiers

PMID40895032
PMCPMC12391765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.