ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2025
Augmentation Samplers for Multinomial Probit Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.
Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bayesian additive tree ensembles for composite quantile regressions.Statistics and computing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The multinomial probit (MNP) (Imai and van Dyk, 2005) framework is based on a multivariate Gaussian latent structure, allowing for natural extensions to multilevel modeling. Unlike multinomial logistic models, MNP does not assume independent alternatives. Kindo et al. (2016) proposed multinomial probit BART (MPBART) to accommodate Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) formulation in MNP. The posterior sampling algorithms for MNP and MPBART are collapsed Gibbs samplers. Because the collapsing augmentation strategy yields a geometric rate of convergence no greater than that of a standard Gibbs sampling step, it is recommended whenever computationally feasible (Liu, 1994a; Imai and van Dyk, 2005). While this strategy necessitates simple sampling steps and a reasonably fast converging Markov chain, the complexity of the stochastic search for posterior trees may undermine its benefit. We address this problem by sampling posterior trees conditional on the constrained parameter space and compare our proposals to that of Kindo et al. (2016), who sample posterior trees based on an augmented parameter space. We also compare to the approach by Sparapani et al. (2021) that specified the multinomial model in terms of conditional probabilities. In terms of MCMC convergence and posterior predictive accuracy, our proposals are comparable to the conditional probability approach and outperform the augmented tree sampling approach. We also show that the theoretical mixing rates of our proposals are guaranteed to be no greater than the augmented tree sampling approach. Appendices and codes for simulations and demonstrations are available online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.