Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894954›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2025

Augmentation Samplers for Multinomial Probit Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.

Yizhen Xu, Joseph Hogan, Michael Daniels, Rami Kantor, Ann Mwangi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yizhen XuDivision of Biostatistics, University of Utah.
Joseph HoganDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University.
Michael DanielsDepartment of Statistics, University of Florida.
Rami KantorDivision of Infectious Diseases, Brown University.
Ann MwangiCollege of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Moi University.

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
Statistical Models for Estimating and Projecting HIV/AIDS EpidemicsR01AI136664 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BAO, LE · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
Optimizing HIV Treatment Monitoring under Resource ConstraintsR01AI108441 · NIAID · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI HOGAN, JOSEPH W, KANTOR, RAMI · 2015 to 2019
$3.5M
Data Science for Decision Support in the HIV Care CascadeR01AI167694 · NIAID · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Hamish SF Fraser, JOSEPH W HOGAN · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
Bayesian machine learning for complex missing data and causal inference with a focus on cardiovascular and obesity studiesR01HL166324 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Michael J Daniels · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
BAYESIAN APPROACHES FOR MISSINGNESS AND CAUSALITY IN CANCER AND BEHAVIOR STUDIESR01CA183854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DANIELS, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
Non-Parametric Bayesian Methods for Causal InferenceR01GM112327 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROY, JASON A · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
HIV Drug Resistance, Monitoring and TransmissionK24AI134359 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI Rami Kantor · 2018 to 2026
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183854NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL166324NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI134359NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108441NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136664NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI167694NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multinomial probit (MNP) (Imai and van Dyk, 2005) framework is based on a multivariate Gaussian latent structure, allowing for natural extensions to multilevel modeling. Unlike multinomial logistic models, MNP does not assume independent alternatives. Kindo et al. (2016) proposed multinomial probit BART (MPBART) to accommodate Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) formulation in MNP. The posterior sampling algorithms for MNP and MPBART are collapsed Gibbs samplers. Because the collapsing augmentation strategy yields a geometric rate of convergence no greater than that of a standard Gibbs sampling step, it is recommended whenever computationally feasible (Liu, 1994a; Imai and van Dyk, 2005). While this strategy necessitates simple sampling steps and a reasonably fast converging Markov chain, the complexity of the stochastic search for posterior trees may undermine its benefit. We address this problem by sampling posterior trees conditional on the constrained parameter space and compare our proposals to that of Kindo et al. (2016), who sample posterior trees based on an augmented parameter space. We also compare to the approach by Sparapani et al. (2021) that specified the multinomial model in terms of conditional probabilities. In terms of MCMC convergence and posterior predictive accuracy, our proposals are comparable to the conditional probability approach and outperform the augmented tree sampling approach. We also show that the theoretical mixing rates of our proposals are guaranteed to be no greater than the augmented tree sampling approach. Appendices and codes for simulations and demonstrations are available online.

Indexed as

Categorical OutcomesData AugmentationLatent Models

Identifiers

PMID40894954
PMCPMC12396500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.