ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Traces of phylogeny and ecology in hippocampal neuron numbers.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is not known how selective pressures shape the numbers of interconnected neurons in defined neural circuits during the phylogeny of mammals. Consequently, models of function are without phylogenetic bounds, and species differences in neuronal makeup cannot be linked to ecological factors that generate selective pressures. Based on data from 65 species belonging to 11 orders, we here provide an analysis of five interconnected neuron populations in the circuitry of the hippocampus, the forebrain region encoding episodic memories. Related species tend to share traits in the hippocampal makeup, with distinct differences between clades. Phylogenetic signals result in the clustering of related species according to relative neuron numbers, but signal strengths allow the clusters to overlap. Tree-based methods show that neuron numbers can be explained by a selective mechanism that constrains them close to an across-species mean. Neuron numbers concerned with hippocampal input are more constrained than those providing output. An ancestral state estimate is provided, and species close to this phenotype are identified. Of the ecological factors tested, food, in terms of diet breadth, leaves its trace in many neuron numbers and strongly so in hippocampal input populations. Home range effects are more selective and relate to neuron ratios rather than neuron numbers. Phylogenetic constraints and ecologically guided relations seem necessary for the appropriate function of hippocampal input across a wide range of species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.