ArticleCJC open2025
Characterization of Malnutrition in Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation.
Article in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study we sought to characterize the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of malnutrition in patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR). Methods: This multicentre, observational study included 802 patients diagnosed with AFMR. The Results: At least mild nutrition risk (GNRI ≤ 98) was present in 57% of patients with AFMR. Patients with lower GNRI were older, had lower body mass index, hemoglobin levels, and renal function, and had a higher prevalence of New York Heart Association class III or IV, dementia, and impaired activities of daily living. During the median follow-up duration of 978 (interquartile range, 492-1141) days, 254 primary outcomes were observed. Increasing severity of malnutrition risk categories was associated with higher rates of the primary outcome. Multivariable analysis revealed that a continuous metric of GNRI was associated with the primary outcome after adjusting for multiple confounders (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.76 per 1 standard deviation increment; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.87; Conclusions: Patients with AFMR and malnutrition represent a vulnerable population with worse clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.