ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Computational rheometry of viscoelastic networks: From random graphs to biomolecular condensates.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multivalent biomacromolecules including multi-domain and intrinsically disordered proteins form biomolecular condensates via reversible phase transitions. Condensates are viscoelastic materials that display composition-specific rheological properties and responses to mechanical forces. Graph-based descriptions of microstructures can be combined with computational rheometry to model the outcomes of passive and active mechanical measurements. We consider two types of network models for microstructures. In the Jeffreys model, each edge in the network is a Jeffreys element. In the Stokes-Maxwell model, each edge is a Maxwell element that is embedded in an incompressible viscous fluid that can undergo Stokes flow. We describe results from comparative assessments of the two models for individual elements, ordered lattices, random geometric graphs, structured graphs, and graphs for condensates that are extracted from coarse-grained simulations of disordered proteins. Results from deformation and relaxation tests and flow field analysis reveal how distinct length and time scales contribute to the responses of different types of networks. No single test provides definitive assessments of the connections between material properties and microstructures. Instead, a range of active and passive rheometric tests are essential for distinguishing the responses of different types of networks. Our work establishes computational rheometry as a framework for bridging disparate length and timescales to assess how molecular-scale interactions and dynamics give rise to viscoelastic responses on the mesoscale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.