ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Learning sequence-function relationships with scalable, interpretable Gaussian processes.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between biological sequences, such as DNA, RNA or protein sequences, and their resulting phenotypes is one of the central goals of genetics. This task is complicated by epistasis, i.e., the context dependence of mutational effects. Advances in high-throughput phenotyping now make it possible to study these relationships at unprecedented scale, generating large datasets that measure phenotypes for tens or hundreds of thousands of sequences. However, standard regression models for analyzing such datasets often make unrealistic assumptions about the generalizability of mutational effects and epistatic coefficients across genetic backgrounds. Deep neural networks offer greater flexibility but suffer from limited interpretability and lack uncertainty quantification. Here, we introduce a family of interpretable Gaussian process models for sequence-function relationships that capture epistasis through flexible prior distributions that generalize classical theoretical models from the fitness landscape literature. In particular, these priors are parameterized by interpretable site-, allele-, and mutation-specific factors controlling the degree to which specific mutations decrease the predictability of the effects of other mutations. Using GPU acceleration to scale to large protein, RNA, and genome-wide SNP datasets, our models consistently deliver superior predictive performance while yielding interpretable parameters that both recover known features and uncover novel epistatic interactions. Overall, our methods provide new insights into the structure of the genotype-phenotype map and offer scalable, interpretable approaches for exploring complex genetic interactions across diverse biological systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.