ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
CanID: a robust and accurate RNAseq Expression-based diagnostic classification scheme for pediatric malignancies.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer subtype classification is critical for precision therapy and there is a growing trend of augmenting histopathology testing procedures with omics-based machine learning classifiers. However, analytical challenges remain for pediatric cancer on the scope and precision of the current classifiers as well as the evolving subtype standardization. To address these challenges, we built Cancer Identification or CanID, a stacked ensemble machine learning classification scheme, using the transcriptomic features derived from gene-level RNA sequencing count data as the sole input. CanID was developed primarily from 3203 pediatric cancer samples of 13 solid tumor subtypes and 38 hematologic malignancy subtypes with subtype labels curated without the use of RNA-seq data. The accuracies of independent testing in three independent or external data sets for Solid Tumor and Hematologic Malignancy are 99% and 92-93%, respectively. Notably, CanID was able to classify subtypes challenging for clinical histology evaluation and was robust to both biological and technical challenges, including differences in data collection protocols, class imbalance, potential mislabeled training samples and classes unobserved in training. The high accuracy, robustness, biological interpretability of this transcriptome-based classification scheme represents a valuable approach to advance tumor diagnosis and clinically meaningful stratification of tumor types. CanID can be accessed on GitHub at https://github.com/chenlab-sj/CanID .
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.