Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894744›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Integrating single-cell and single-nucleus datasets improves bulk RNA-seq deconvolution.

Adriana Ivich, Casey S Greene

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adriana IvichDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Casey S GreeneDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-9213

Funding

Characterization of high-grade serous ovarian cancer subtypes via single-cell profilingR01CA237170 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOHERTY, JENNIFER A., GREENE, CASEY S · 2019 to 2024
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bulk RNA-seq deconvolution typically uses single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) references, but some cell types are only detectable through single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq). Because snRNA-seq captures nuclear, but not cytoplasmic, transcripts, direct use as a reference could reduce deconvolution accuracy. Here, we systematically benchmark strategies to integrate both modalities, focusing on transformations and gene-filtering approaches that harmonize snRNA-seq with scRNA-seq references. Across four diverse tissues, we evaluated principal component-based shifts, conditional and non-conditional variational autoencoders (scVI), and the removal of cross-modality differentially expressed genes (DEGs). While all methods improved performance relative to untransformed snRNA-seq, filtering consistent cross-modality DEGs delivered the greatest gains, often matching or surpassing scRNA-only references. Conditional scVI performed comparably and was especially effective when matched scRNA-snRNA cell types were unavailable. In real adipose bulk samples without ground truth, DEG pruning and conditional scVI provided the most robust cell-fraction estimates across donors and transformations. Together, these results demonstrate that scRNA-seq should be prioritized as the reference when available, with snRNA-seq appended only after filtering cross-modality DEGs. For less-characterized systems where DEG information is limited, conditional scVI offers a practical alternative. Our findings provide clear guidelines for modality-aware integration, enabling near-scRNA-seq accuracy in bulk deconvolution workflows.

Identifiers

PMID40894744
PMCPMC12393506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.