ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Inverse-scattering in biological samples via beam-propagation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple scattering limits optical imaging in thick biological samples by scrambling sample-specific information. Physics-based inverse-scattering methods aim to computationally recover this information, often using non-convex optimization to reconstruct the scatter-corrected sample. However, this non-convexity can lead to inaccurate reconstructions, especially in highly scattering samples. Here, we show that various implementation strategies for even the same inverse-scattering method significantly affect reconstruction quality. We demonstrate this using multi-slice beam propagation (MSBP), a relatively simple nonconvex inverse-scattering method that reconstructs a scattering sample's 3D refractive-index (RI). By systematically conducting MSBP-based inverse-scattering on both phantoms and biological samples, we showed that an amplitude-only cost function in the inverse-solver, combined with angular and defocus diversity in the scattering measurements, enabled high-quality, fully-volumetric RI imaging. This approach achieved subcellular resolution and label-free 3D contrast across diverse, multiple-scattering samples. These results lay the groundwork for robust use of inverse-scattering techniques to achieve biologically interpretable 3D imaging in increasingly thick, multicellular samples, introducing a new paradigm for deep-tissue computational imaging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.