ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Correctness is its own reward: bootstrapping error signals in self-guided reinforcement learning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beta-Hydroxybutyrate but not NMN supplementation mimics caloric restriction reducing early mortality in Daphnia.Biogerontology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a compelling account of how agents learn complex behaviors by trial and error, yet RL is predicated on the existence of a reward function provided by the agent's environment. By contrast, many skills are learned without external guidance, posing a challenge to RL's ability to account for self-directed learning. For instance, juvenile male zebra finches first memorize and then train themselves to reproduce the song of an adult male tutor through extensive practice. This process is believed to be guided by an internally computed assessment of performance quality, though the mechanism and development of this signal remain unknown. Here, we propose that, contrary to prevailing assumptions, tutor song memorization and performance assessment are subserved by the same neural circuit, one trained to predictively cancel tutor song. To test this hypothesis, we built models of a local forebrain circuit that learns to use contextual input from premotor regions to cancel tutor song auditory input via plasticity at different synaptic loci. We found that, after learning, excitatory projection neurons in these circuits exhibited population error codes signaling mismatches between the tutor song memory and birds' own performance, and these signals best matched experimental data when networks were trained with anti-Hebbian plasticity in the recurrent pathway through inhibitory interneurons. We also found that model learning proceeds in two stages, with an initial phase of sharpening error sensitivity followed by a fine-tuning period in which error responses to the tutor song are minimized. Finally, we showed that the error signal produced by this model can train a simple RL agent to replicate the spectrograms of adult bird songs. Together, our results suggest that purely local learning via predictive cancellation suffices for bootstrapping error signals capable of guiding self-directed learning of natural behaviors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.