ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A Deep Neural Network Model of Audiovisual Speech Recognition Reports the McGurk Effect.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the McGurk effect, perception of an auditory syllable changes dramatically when it is paired with an incongruent visual syllable, countering our intuition that speech perception is solely an auditory process. The dominant modeling framework for the study of audiovisual speech perception is that of Bayesian causal inference, but current Bayesian models are unable to predict the wide range of percepts evoked by McGurk syllables. We explored whether a deep neural network (DNN) known as AVHuBERT could provide an alternative modeling framework. AVHuBERT model variants were presented with McGurk syllables consisting of auditory "ba" paired with visual "ga" recorded from 8 different talkers. AVHuBERT identified McGurk syllables as something other than "ba" at a rate of 59%, demonstrating a robust McGurk effect. The rate of the McGurk effect was similar to that observed in humans: 100 participants presented with the same McGurk syllables reported non-"ba" percepts on 56% of trials. AVHubert variants and humans produced a wide variety of responses to McGurk syllables, including the canonical McGurk fusion percept of "da", responses without any initial consonant such as "ah" and responses with other initial consonants such as "fa". The ability to predict percepts experienced by humans but not predicted by current Bayesian models suggest that DNNs and Bayesian models may provide complementary windows into the perceptual mechanisms underlying human audiovisual speech perception.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.