Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894501›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Metagenomic analysis of the effects of plant- and yeast-based formulations on the grapevine leaf microbiome of cv. 'Touriga Franca'.

Eliana Monteiro, Paula Baptista, Sofia Silva, Márcia Carvalho, Radek Bragança, Kieran J Guinan, Neerakkal Sujeeth, Isabel Cortez, Berta Gonçalves, Isaura Castro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eliana MonteiroCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Paula BaptistaMountain Research Center (CIMO), Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.
Sofia SilvaMountain Research Center (CIMO), Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Bragança, Portugal.
Márcia CarvalhoCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Radek BragançaBioComposites Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom.
Kieran J GuinanClash Industrial Estate, BioAtlantis Ltd., Tralee, Ireland.
Neerakkal SujeethClash Industrial Estate, BioAtlantis Ltd., Tralee, Ireland.
Isabel CortezCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Berta GonçalvesCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Isaura CastroCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Grapevine is highly susceptible to fungal diseases such as downy mildew and powdery mildew, which are traditionally managed through the intensive use of chemical fungicides. However, in the context of increasingly sustainable viticulture, biofungicides derived from plant and yeast extracts are gaining attention. Despite this, their impact on the grapevine leaf microbiome, crucial for plant health and disease resilience, remains underexplored. Material and methods: This study evaluated the effects of foliar applications of biofungicides (nettle extract, Japanese knotweed extract, and a yeast-based formulation - T66 and T90) in comparison with conventional chemical treatments and control (no treatment). Over two consecutive growing seasons, high-throughput sequencing was used to assess the diversity and composition of fungal and bacterial communities on grapevine leaves. Results: Bacterial communities were more sensitive to treatments and interannual variability than fungal communities, which remained relatively stable. Conventional treatment (CT) showed the highest influence on fungal and bacterial composition, reducing the diversity of both. Some important fungal ( Discussion: These findings reinforce the potential of new treatments with putative fungicide effects to modulate the leaf microbiome, particularly bacterial communities, without disrupting the natural fungal balance. Thus highlight their relevance for developing sustainable viticultural practices aimed at improving plant protection.

Indexed as

leaves microbiomemetabarcodingmicrobial community diversityplant extractsVitis vinifera L.yeast-based formulations

Identifiers

PMID40894501
PMCPMC12391083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.