ReviewEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prothioconazole.
Review in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pesticide Residues in Vegetables: The Potential Risk Assessment of Endocrine and Reproductive Disruptors for Children and Adults.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Use of conversion factors for the setting of MRLs of prothioconazole.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Comparative toxicity of plant protection products, their active substances and mixtures in zebrafish embryos and HepaRG cells.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for prothioconazole in various crops.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prothioconazole.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Review
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for prothioconazole in sugar beet and chicory roots.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for prothioconazole in garlic, onions and shallots.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review and modification of the existing maximum residue levels for prothioconazole in celeriacs and rapeseeds.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 50th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018Article
- Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 47th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2015Article
- Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for prothioconazole according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
49 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom and Poland, after Brexit and co-rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance prothioconazole are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of prothioconazole as a fungicide on barley, wheat, oats, spelt, rye and triticale field crops and seeds. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.