Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894445›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025

Comparative Prognostic Accuracy of Clinical and Inflammation- or Nutrition-Based Scores in Older Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Merve Eksioglu, Burcu Azapoglu Kaymak, Ebru Unal Akoglu, Selman Faruk Akyıldız, Ramazan Sivil, Tuba Cimilli Ozturk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Merve EksiogluDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0108-9855
Burcu Azapoglu KaymakDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ebru Unal AkogluDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selman Faruk AkyıldızDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ramazan SivilDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-2117
Tuba Cimilli OzturkDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the prognostic accuracy of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in predicting 30-day mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission compared with the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and CURB-65 in older adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Patients and Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted in a tertiary emergency department. Patients aged ≥65 years with CAP were included. Exclusion criteria were hospital- or ventilator-associated pneumonia, pneumonia mimics, and immunocompromised status. GPS and mGPS were calculated using CRP >10 mg/L and albumin <35 g/L. ROC and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 349 patients (mean age: 77.96 ± 8.42 years; 52.7% men) were included. The 30-day mortality and ICU admission rates were 19.5% and 27.2%, respectively. For predicting mortality, the GPS showed an AUC of 0.753 (95% CI: 0.690-0.816), sensitivity of 75.0%, specificity of 73.3%, PPV of 43.9%, and NPV of 92.4%. mGPS had an AUC of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.679-0.814), sensitivity 77.9%, specificity 73.3%, PPV 45.2%, and NPV 93.2%. The CAR yielded an AUC of 0.677 (95% CI: 0.604-0.751), sensitivity of 82.4%, specificity of 45.6%, PPV of 29.5%, and NPV of 91.4%. For ICU admission, the AUCs were 0.770 (GPS), 0.757 (mGPS), and 0.676 (CAR). The PSI demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.884 for mortality, 0.919 for ICU admission), followed by CURB-65 (AUC: 0.848 and 0.879, respectively). Independent predictors of 30-day mortality included acute confusion, lower PaO Conclusion: The PSI and CURB-65 demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy. GPS and mGPS showed moderate performance, whereas CAR exhibited the lowest overall discriminative ability for both outcomes.

Indexed as

CARcommunity-acquired pneumoniaC-reactive protein to albumin ratiogeriatric emergency careglasgow prognostic scoreGPSpneumonia severity indexprognostic scoresPSI

Identifiers

PMID40894445
PMCPMC12399091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.