ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2025
Innovative Orbital Periosteum Suturing Technique for Endoscopic Medial Orbital Wall Reconstruction.
Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Transnasal Approach for Deep Lateral Orbital Decompression: A Cadaver Study.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Advances in endoscopic orbital surgery have sparked discussion regarding reconstructive procedures for medial orbital wall defects following tumor removal. This study describes an innovative orbital periosteal suturing technique that addresses the functional and aesthetic concerns created by orbital surgery. Objective: Comprehensive clinical evaluation of a novel orbital periosteal suturing technique for endoscopic medial orbital wall reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified five patients who underwent endoscopic transnasal resection and subsequent orbital periosteal suturing for reconstruction. The surgical approach involved a binostril transseptal technique to create a broad surgical corridor. The postoperative follow-up was 13.4 ± 1.8 months. Results: In the five patients, the mean age was 47.6 ± 13.0 years and the lesions were predominantly distributed on the left side (60%). Reconstruction time with the orbital periosteal suture procedure averaged 47.2 ± 6.6 minutes, employing four to five stitches. No patients experienced short-term complications such as visual acuity defect, new or exacerbated diplopia, or cranial nerve palsy within 2 weeks, and no long-term complications such as enophthalmos or prolonged diplopia were observed. Conclusion: Orbital periosteal suturing is an effective and resource-efficient technique for endoscopic reconstruction of the medial orbital wall. Surgeons may consider this method among the available options for orbital reconstruction, representing a novel advancement in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.