Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894407›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and prognosis assessment of fetal neck masses.

Peipei Zhang, Xining Wu, Yunshu Ouyang, Tianrui Yang, Yixiu Zhang, Hui You, Yan Lv, Yulin Jiang, Qing Dai, Hua Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peipei Zhang *Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xining Wu *Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yunshu OuyangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Tianrui YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yixiu ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hui YouDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yan LvDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yulin JiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qing DaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hua MengDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study retrospectively analyzed the prenatal ultrasound features and outcomes of fetal neck masses to improve the understanding of fetal neck masses and provide evidence for prenatal consultation, prognosis assessment, delivery mode selection, and clinical intervention. Methods: From January 2018 to November 2023, 18 patients who underwent routine prenatal ultrasonography in the ultrasound department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital or who were referred to our hospital for the diagnosis of a fetal neck mass were retrospectively identified. Their prenatal ultrasound characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were examined and follow-up was conducted. Results: There were 18 cases of fetal neck masses. The mean gestational age at which the fetal neck mass was first detected was 27 ± 6 weeks (range 17-38 weeks). There were seven (39%) male fetuses, nine (50%) female fetuses, and two (11%) fetuses of undetermined sex. The clinical diagnosis was lymphangioma in 14 cases (78%), hemangioma in two (11%), teratoma in one (6%), and congenital goiter in one (6%). The maximum diameter of the fetal neck mass at the first ultrasound examination was 1.8-8.6 cm, and the median diameter was 4.3 (2.5, 6.5) cm. The median mass volume was 17.0 (3.5, 59.0) cm Conclusion: A fetal neck mass is a rare benign lesion. Accurate evaluation of the size and location of the cervical mass by prenatal ultrasound, auxiliary examinations such as magnetic resonance imaging, and assessments of clinical manifestations and related complications are crucial for appropriate prenatal consultation, prognosis assessment, delivery mode selection, and postpartum management. Multidisciplinary treatment is essential for the successful management of fetal cervical masses.

Indexed as

diagnosismagnetic resonance imagingmultidisciplinary treatmentneck massprenatal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40894407
PMCPMC12391094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.