ArticleBone reports2025
Inpatient rehabilitation fracture liaison service (FLS) improves outcomes for secondary prevention of hip fractures.
Article in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [SEIOMM-SEMERGEN-semFYC-SEMG recommendations for the management of patients with osteoporosis/fragility fracture in primary care].Atencion primaria · 2026Guideline
- From explainable muscle imaging to actionable fracture prevention after vertebral augmentation.European radiology · 2026Article
- An audit of the fracture liaison service at Helen Joseph Tertiary Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- FLS shortens time to osteoporosis treatment and lowers 1-year refracture risk post proximal femoral fracture.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2026Article
- Digitally enhanced fracture liaison service in Austria-a feasibility analysis.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Secondary fracture prevention is a well-defined treatment-gap within osteoporosis management. Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) coordinates the management and treatment of patients following a fragility fracture in order to close the care gap. We aim to assess the efficacy of the FLS initiative in the management and treatment of patients following fragility hip fracture in the inpatient rehabilitation setting. Methods: This is a diagnostic, retrospective cohort study using a deidentified, electronic health record database. In the extraction process, patients with fragility hip fractures were identified. Patients after major trauma or malignancy were excluded. The prevalence of initiation and adherence to anti-osteoporotic treatments, including alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate, denosumab, romosozumab, and teriparatide, was compared between the rehabilitation FLS initiative patients and patients from other hospitals without FLS. Results: A total of 4,124 patients with fragility hip fractures were identified between 2017 and 2021. The FLS initiative showed significantly higher rates of treatment initiation, with 72.1 % of patients receiving pharmacological therapy following a hip fracture, compared to 45.1 % in hospitals without FLS (p < 0.001). Patients in the FLS group also demonstrated higher rates of good adherence and lower rates of poor adherence (p < 0.001). Denosumab was the most commonly prescribed anti-osteoporotic treatment within the FLS initiative. Conclusions: The FLS in the inpatient rehabilitation setting was found to be highly effective in improving time to treatment initiation and adherence rates to prescribe anti-osteoporosis therapy. These findings demonstrate the role of FLS in addressing the osteoporosis treatment gap following fragility hip fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.