ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
Stain-free artificial intelligence-assisted light microscopy for the identification of blood cells in microfluidic flow.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered Neutrophils in Translational Medicine: Gene Editing, Nanotechnology, and AI-Driven Clinical Breakthroughs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Stain-free artificial intelligence-assisted light microscopy for the identification of leukocyte morphology change in presence of bacteria.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification and classification of blood cells are essential for diagnosing and managing various haematological conditions. Haematology analysers typically perform full blood counts but often require follow-up tests such as blood smears. Traditional methods like stained blood smears are laborious and subjective. This study explores the application of artificial neural networks for rapid, automated, and objective classification of major blood cell types from unstained brightfield images. The YOLO v4 object detection architecture was trained on datasets comprising erythrocytes, echinocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets imaged using a microfluidic flow system. Binary classification between erythrocytes and echinocytes achieved a network F1 score of 86%. Expanding to four classes (erythrocytes, echinocytes, leukocytes, platelets) yielded a network F1 score of 85%, with some misclassified leukocytes. Further separating leukocytes into lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils, while also increasing the dataset and tweaking model parameters resulted in a network F1 score of 84.1%. Most importantly, the neural network's performance was comparable to that of flow cytometry and haematology analysers when tested on donor samples. These findings demonstrate the potential of artificial intelligence for high-throughput morphological analysis of unstained blood cells, enabling rapid screening and diagnosis. Integrating this approach with microfluidics could streamline conventional techniques and provide a fast automated full blood count with morphological assessment without the requirement for sample handling. Further refinements by training on abnormal cells could facilitate early disease detection and treatment monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.