Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894373›Full record

ArticleStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2025

Trends in Isolated and Combined Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients Younger Than 65 Years.

Tanush Gupta, James T DeVries, Hsiang-Ching Huang, Cathy S Ross, David Butzel, James M Flynn, Michael N Young, Rony N Lahoud, Frank Ittleman, Ansar Hassan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tanush GuptaDivision of Cardiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States.
James T DeVriesDivision of Cardiology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States.
Hsiang-Ching HuangDivision of Cardiology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States.
Cathy S RossDivision of Cardiology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States.
David ButzelDivision of Cardiology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, United States.
James M FlynnDivision of Cardiology, Catholic Medical Center, Manchester, New Hampshire, United States.
Michael N YoungDivision of Cardiology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States.
Rony N LahoudDivision of Cardiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States.
Frank IttlemanDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, United States.
Ansar HassanDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, United States.
Harold L DauermanDivision of Cardiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent data demonstrate near equalization in the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and isolated bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients aged <65 years for treatment of isolated aortic stenosis (AS). Whether these trends are also seen across the entire spectrum of aortic valve replacement (AVR) procedures (including mechanical SAVR and concomitant procedures) is unknown. Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged <65 years who underwent AVR for severe AS in the multicenter Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Group registry between 2015 and 2023. Patients were stratified by approach: TAVR, isolated SAVR, and combined SAVR (SAVR with concomitant procedures). Results: Of 1254 patients younger than 65 years who underwent AVR, 21.9% underwent TAVR, 39.7% underwent isolated SAVR, and 38.4% underwent combined SAVR. TAVR utilization more than doubled during the study period, with near equalization of TAVR and isolated bioprosthetic SAVR (28.3% and 30.8% of all AVR in 2021-2023, respectively). However, when including mechanical AVR and combined SAVR, TAVR only comprised approximately one-fourth of all AVR procedures. TAVR patients had a significantly higher burden of comorbidities compared with patients receiving isolated or combined SAVR. Conclusions: In this multicenter study, there is a consistent increase in TAVR use in patients <65 years old with preferential TAVR utilization in patients with higher comorbidities and risk. While approximately 50% of younger patients with isolated AS are receiving TAVR in recent study years, the overall utilization of TAVR in the broader group of patients with both isolated and combined AS remains approximately 25% of the overall AVR cohort.

Indexed as

Aortic stenosisSurgical aortic valve replacementTemporal trendsTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID40894373
PMCPMC12399252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.