Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894299›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Strategies and manoeuvres for severe rigid scoliosis.

Venugopal K Menon, Ranjith Unnikrishnan, Chandhan Murugan, Mantu Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Venugopal K MenonRajagiri Hoispital, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Ranjith UnnikrishnanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Chandhan MuruganDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Mantu JainDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, 751019, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe rigid scoliosis presents formidable surgical challenges, even for the most seasoned spine surgeons. Patients with idiopathic scoliosis frequently exhibit severe manifestations after years of progressive deformity, characterised by pronounced curves, significant rib humps, shoulder and trunk asymmetry, and cardiorespiratory complications associated with untreated scoliosis. In our practice, around one-third of patients with scoliosis present with advanced, severe, rigid scoliosis (>90° and 25 % correction on bending radiographs). Discourse persists concerning the optimal surgical technique for rectifying these inflexible curves. Rigid scoliosis typically manifests as either acute angular or rounded deformities. Rounded deformities can be effectively addressed through an anterior release to alleviate the apex and posterior instrumentation, including osteotomies if necessary. Halo traction, temporary internal distraction, releases, osteotomies, and apical vertebral resection are frequently employed concurrently to attain optimal outcomes. Intraoperative strategies include apical translation, rod derotation, cantilever, direct vertebral rotation, in-situ bending, and stiffer rods. Conversely, severe rigid scoliosis, characterised by a pronounced angular deformity, is inappropriate for anterior release and is optimally addressed via posterior-only vertebral column resection and posterior instrumentation.

Indexed as

IdiopathicOsteotomyRigidScoliosisSevereTractionVertebral column resection

Identifiers

PMID40894299
PMCPMC12392767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.