ArticleCurrent urology2025
Reducing pain and opioid use: Implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway for percutaneous nephrolithotomy with an erector spinae plane block.
Article in Current urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is no standard analgesic pathway after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. At our institution, an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway was instated that included a preoperative erector spinae plane (ESP) block to improve pain control and minimize opioid usage in the postoperative setting. Materials and methods: At our institution, an ERAS pathway was created for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. This pathway involved a preoperative ESP block and the replacement of opioids with multimodal analgesia. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed and placed into 2 cohorts: one cohort participated in the ERAS pathway, whereas the other received traditional pain control. The primary outcome evaluated was postoperative morphine equivalents received. Secondary outcomes included nursing pain scores, opioid prescriptions for home, and quality of life. Descriptive statistics were performed by nonparametric Mann-Whitney Results: Sixty patients were identified in the ERAS cohort versus 70 in the traditional pain control cohort. There was a statistically significant difference in average postoperative morphine equivalents received (17.0 vs. 39.9, Conclusions: An ERAS pathway including a preoperative ESP block and multimodal analgesia decreased morphine equivalents received and nursing pain scores. Future randomized prospective studies with the ERAS protocol can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.