ArticleCurrent urology2025
The relevance of nomograms for prediction of pelvic lymph node metastases in the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT era.
Article in Current urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Can pelvic lymph node dissection be spared in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with negative PSMA PET scan? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Current guidelines suggest that the indications for pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) should rely on nomograms predicting their involvement. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand is gaining acceptance as routine diagnostic test before RP in patients with intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer (PC). In this study, we examined the effect of preoperative PET/CT on the accuracy of the nomograms. Materials and methods: Patients with intermediate/high risk PC showing no extraprostatic disease on PET/CT-PSMA underwent RP with PLND and were followed postoperatively for at least 6 months. Patients with detectable (>0.1 ng/mL) postoperative prostate-specific antigen levels underwent re-evaluation with PET/CT-PSMA. Results: A total of 70 patients underwent RP for intermediate (34 patients) or high-risk disease (36 patients). According to the Partin, MSKCC, and Briganti 2012 nomograms, positive LNs were expected in 7, 13, and 12 patients, respectively. At PLND, 1 positive LN was found in a single patient ( Conclusions: Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT with no extraprostatic uptake before RP in patients with intermediate to high-grade PC is highly accurate for ruling out LN involvement, superior to the routinely used nomograms. Its use induced stage migration, rendering predictive nomograms irrelevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.