ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Multilevel and multidimensional features of socioeconomic status and cognitive function in older adulthood: a cross-sectional analysis of the IGNITE study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Cognitive and Brain Reserve as Modifiers of Early Alzheimer Disease-Related Cognitive Vulnerability.Neurology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia, yet reliance on singular indicators of SES limits understanding of these relationships. We examined multiple SES characteristics at the individual and area-levels simultaneously in association with diverse cognitive processes in a large, community-dwelling older adult sample. Methods: Data collected at three United States sites (Boston, Pittsburgh, Kansas City) included a comprehensive cognitive assessment comprising measures of episodic memory, executive function, processing speed, working memory, and visuospatial abilities. Multiple SES measures were obtained including area-level (Area Deprivation Index), subjective, and objective SES. We generated a novel objective SES latent factor from measures of income, savings, debt-adjusted savings, and financial stability using full information maximum likelihood to address missing data, and examined cross-sectional associations of SES indicators with each cognitive domain as outcome variables in multivariable regression models. Findings: This study included 648 cognitively unimpaired older adults (69.88 (3.75) years; 71% female). Individual-level objective SES (processing speed, Interpretation: Standard measures of objective SES may underestimate the broad cognitive burden of socioeconomic inequity. Integrating multiple financial indicators into future studies may improve estimation of the public health impact of socioeconomic conditions in older adulthood. Funding: National Institutes of Health (R01AG053952).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.