Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894264›Full record

ArticleUniversal access in the information society2025

Robot usability in the wild: bridging accessibility gaps for diverse user groups in complex forestry operations.

Florian Ehrlich-Sommer, Bernhard Hörl, Christoph Gollob, Arne Nothdurft, Karl Stampfer, Andreas Holzinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Universal access in the information society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Florian Ehrlich-SommerHuman-Centered AI Lab, Institute of Forest Engineering, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bernhard HörlHuman-Centered AI Lab, Institute of Forest Engineering, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph GollobInstitute of Forest Growth, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Arne NothdurftInstitute of Forest Growth, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Karl StampferHuman-Centered AI Lab, Institute of Forest Engineering, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas HolzingerHuman-Centered AI Lab, Institute of Forest Engineering, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the usability and effectiveness of robotic platforms working together with foresters in the wild on forest inventory tasks using LiDAR scanning. Emphasis was on the Universal Access principle, ensuring that robotic solutions are not only effective but also environmentally responsible and accessible for diverse users. Three robotic platforms were tested: Boston Dynamics Spot, AgileX Scout, and Bunker Mini. Spot's quadrupedal locomotion struggled in dense undergrowth, leading to frequent mobility failures and a System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 78 ± 10. Its short, battery life and complex recovery processes further limited its suitability for forest operations without substantial modifications. In contrast, the wheeled AgileX Scout and tracked Bunker Mini demonstrated superior usability, each achieving a high SUS score of 88 ± 5. However, environmental impact varied: Scout's wheeled design caused minimal disturbance, whereas Bunker Mini's tracks occasionally damaged young vegetation, highlighting the importance of gentle interaction with natural ecosystems in robotic forestry. All platforms enhanced worker safety, reduced physical effort, and improved LiDAR workflows by eliminating the need for human presence during scans. Additionally, the study engaged forest engineering students, equipping them with hands-on experience in emerging robotic technologies and fostering discussions on their responsible integration into forestry practices. This study lays a crucial foundation for the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into forest robotics, enabling future advancements in autonomous perception, decision-making, and adaptive navigation. By systematically evaluating robotic platforms in real-world forest environments, this research provides valuable empirical data that will inform AI-driven enhancements, such as machine learning-based terrain adaptation, intelligent path planning, and autonomous fault recovery. Furthermore, the study holds high value for the international research community, serving as a benchmark for future developments in forestry robotics and AI applications. Moving forward, future research will build on these findings to explore adaptive remote operation, AI-powered terrain-aware navigation, and sustainable deployment strategies, ensuring that robotic solutions enhance both operational efficiency and ecological responsibility in forest management worldwide.

Indexed as

Forest robotics systemsHuman–robot interactionLiDAR scanning technologyOperational robotics efficiencyRobot usabilitySystem usability testingUsability evaluation methodsUser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID40894264
PMCPMC12394322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.