Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894241›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2025

A novel signal processing approach enabled by machine learning for the detection and identification of chemical warfare agent simulants using a GC-QEPAS system.

Nicola Liberatore, Giorgio Felizzato, Sandro Mengali, Roberto Viola, Francesco Saverio Romolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicola LiberatoreConsorzio CREO, L'Aquila, Italy.
Giorgio FelizzatoDepartment of Law, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Sandro MengaliConsorzio CREO, L'Aquila, Italy.
Roberto ViolaConsorzio CREO, L'Aquila, Italy.
Francesco Saverio RomoloDepartment of Law, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection and identification of chemical warfare agents (CWAs) present challenges in emergency response scenarios and for safety and security applications. This study presents the development and validation of an innovative analytical method using a gas chromatography (GC) and quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (QEPAS) sensor for the detection of stimulants for six CWAs. Following the guidelines of the European Network of Forensic Science Institute (ENFSI) and the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808, the analytical method was validated. The validation results demonstrated the robustness and reliability of both the GC and QEPAS modules. Moreover, with regard to the toxicological threshold levels, this study highlights the efficacy of a prototype of a portable device for real security and safety applications. Furthermore, a machine learning (ML) approach was developed to automate the detection and identification of CWAs' stimulants. The workflow involved two interconnected stages: detection based on chromatographic retention times (RTs), and identification using infrared (IR) spectra through the one-class support vector machines classifier. The classifier was activated only after obtaining a positive detection based on RTs. The results highlight the ML model's effectiveness in CWA detection and identification, combining RT analysis and IR spectrum classification, achieving 97% accuracy at a 95.5% confidence interval and 99% accuracy at a 99.7% confidence interval; this result demonstrates the model's utility for real-world security and safety applications for CWAs.

Indexed as

chemical warfare agentschemical weaponsforensic sciencesgas chromatographymachine learningquartz enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40894241
PMCPMC12392267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.