ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Effect of smoking on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment outcomes and exploring potential pathways: A multicountry cohort study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People who smoke are at increased risk of unfavorable tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes compared with those who do not, but the pathways explaining this effect are unclear. We estimated the effect of smoking on a successful end-of-treatment outcome for multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant (MDR/RR) TB and examined if intervening on loss to follow-up mitigates this effect. The endTB Observational Study was a prospective cohort of people with MDR/RR-TB who were treated with longer regimens containing bedaquiline and/or delamanid. We used marginal standardization to examine the effect of smoking (≥1 cigarette daily at enrollment) on treatment success (cured/completed). To simulate intervening on lost to follow-up, we censored participants and applied inverse probability of censoring weights. Among 1786 participants in 12 countries, 539 (30.2%) reported smoking. At the end of treatment, 73.5% of people who smoked and 80.3% of people who did not smoke had treatment success (risk difference in percentage points: -6.8, 95% CI: -11.1, -2.6). After adjusting for baseline confounders including demographics, social history, and comorbidities, the risk difference was similar (-5.2 percentage points) but 95% CIs were less precise (-14.1, 3.2). In a pseudopopulation without loss to follow-up, the risk difference was reduced (-1.9 percentage points; 95% CI: -10.2, 5.1). People who smoked had less frequent MDR/RR-TB treatment success compared with those who did not smoke. A simulated intervention on loss to follow-up reduced this difference, suggesting that pathways related to retention in care were a driver of this effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.