ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Development of PROWalk: a functional mobility person-reported outcome measure based on the PROMIS
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Assessing an individual's physical capacity to move independently and safely to perform activities of daily living (i.e., functional mobility) can be approached through various modalities, including performance-based physiological tests, observational assessments, and self-report questionnaires. The purpose of this study was to establish a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), termed PROWalk Methods: The PROWalk PROM was developed with expert clinician input as a custom short form composed of selected items from the Item Bank. Participants with lower extremity peripheral neuropathy who had been prescribed a wearable sensory prosthesis were administered the PROWalk and the PSFS, a perceived functional mobility assessment via telecommunications at baseline and six weeks after wearing the sensory prosthesis. Results: Both measures displayed significant increases (i.e., improvements) over time with large effect sizes and upward linear trends for each instrument between baseline and six weeks. When normalized, the measures showed no bias, large limits of agreement, and no normalized change between the instruments. Discussion: The PROWalk PROM detected significant improvements in perceived functional mobility over time and showed strong temporal stability and suitability for standardized group-level comparisons, which were similar to the PSFS. Overall, the PROWalk appears to be a valid PROM for capturing improvements in self-reported functional mobility related to gait and balance function.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.