Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894145›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Estimating ascending aortic diameter from the electrocardiogram.

Zachariah S Demarais, Jeffrey E Olgin, James P Pirruccello

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zachariah S Demarais
James P PirruccelloORCID 0000-0001-6088-4037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an analysis of 69,173 UK Biobank participants, we paired MRI-based measurements of the ascending aortic diameter with ECG signal. We trained a 1D convolutional neural network (ECGAI-TAA) to consume the 10-second 500Hz 12-lead signal and to emit an estimate of the ascending aortic diameter. We assessed model performance in an internal test set of 5,191 participants. The resulting model explained 31% of the variance in aortic diameter, and it couldn't be fully explained by clinical factors such as age, sex, height, weight, pulse rate, blood pressure, or left ventricular mass. Evaluating a clinically relevant diameter threshold (4.0cm, representing dilation), 2.5% of the population had a dilated ascending aorta; when comparing that same proportion of the population (individuals in the top 2.5% of the deep learning model score) to the remaining participants, we found a nearly 16-fold odds ratio for aortic dilation. Using a variational autoencoder-based visualization, we hypothesized that a lateral-superior axis shift may underlie the electrical changes being detected by the model. An important limitation is that these findings represent a physiological observation, not an externally validated risk score. In conclusion, the ECGAI-TAA deep learning model demonstrates that ascending aortic diameter can be, in part, estimated from the 12-lead ECG.

Identifiers

PMID40894145
PMCPMC12393676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.