ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
DRIVE-KG: Enhancing variant-phenotype association discovery in understudied complex diseases using heterogeneous knowledge graphs.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-omics data are instrumental in obtaining a comprehensive picture of complex biological systems. This is particularly useful for women's health conditions, such as endometriosis which has been historically understudied despite having a high prevalence (around 10% of women of reproductive age). Subsequently, endometriosis has limited genetic characterization: current genome-wide association studies explain only 11% of its 47% total estimated heritability. Graph representations provide an intuitive and meaningful way to relate concepts across diverse data sources and address fundamental sparsity and dimensionality challenges with multi-omics data analysis. Here we present DRIVE-KG (Disease Risk Inference and Variant Exploration-Knowledge Graph), which uses a heterogeneous graph representation to integrate biological data from multi-omics datasets: dbSNP, NCBI Human Gene, Omics Pred, GTEx, and Open Targets. We drew directly from the knowledge captured in these data, using nodes to represent genes, single nucleotide polymorphisms, proteins, and phenotypes, and edges to represent relationships between these concepts. We trained two models using DRIVE-KG: a link prediction model to suggest associations between SNPs and two pilot phenotypes (endometriosis and obesity), and a graph convolutional network (GCN) to classify patient-level endometriosis status. We conducted the patient-level classification using data from 1,441 Penn Medicine BioBank participants with gold standard chart-reviewed endometriosis status. The link prediction model uncovered 66 high-confidence (score ≥ 0.95) previously unreported SNP-endometriosis associations. Many of these variants were linked to obesity/body mass index traits (24.2%), lipid metabolism (6%), and depressive disorders (4.5%), showing agreement with emerging hypotheses about endometriosis etiology. In contrast, 11% of the 149 high confidence, candidate SNP-obesity associations (score ≥ 0.9888) were in LD with known obesity associations. The GCN to classify patient endometriosis status had an AUPRC of 0.738 compared to 0.679 for a genetic risk score. Despite this moderate improvement, we found that the GCN learned meaningful stratification of underlying adenomyosis signal and severe grades of endometriosis. We have demonstrated that heterogeneous integration of multi-omics data is valuable for diverse downstream tasks-including discovery and clinical prediction-particularly for understudied diseases where traditional genomic approaches are insufficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.