Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894124›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Classification of familial and non-familial ADHD using auto-encoding network and binary hypothesis testing.

Rahman Baboli, Elizabeth Martin, Qinyin Qiu, Lin Zhao, Tianming Liu, Xiaobo Li

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rahman Baboli
Elizabeth Martin
Qinyin Qiu
Lin Zhao
Tianming Liu
Xiaobo Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family history is one the most powerful risk factor for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), yet no study has tested whether multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) combined with deep learning can separate familial ADHD (ADHD-F) and non-familial ADHD (ADHD-NF). T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI data from 438 children (129 ADHD-F, 159 ADHD-NF, and 150 controls) were parcellated into 425 cortical and white-matter metrics. Our pipeline combined three feature-selection steps (t-test filtering, mutual-information ranking, and Lasso) with an auto-encoder and applied the binary-hypothesis strategy throughout; each held-out subject was assigned both possible labels in turn and evaluated under leave-one-out testing nested within five-fold cross-validation. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) quantified performance. The model achieved accuracies/AUCs of 0.66 / 0.67 for ADHD-F vs controls, 0.67 / 0.70 for ADHD-NF vs controls, and 0.62 / 0.67 for ADHD-F vs ADHD-NF. In classification between ADHD-F and controls, the most informative metrics were the mean diffusivity (MD) of the right fornix, the MD of the left parahippocampal cingulum, and the cortical thickness of the right inferior parietal cortex. In classification between ADHD-NF and controls, the key contributors were the fractional anisotropy (FA) of the left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, the MD of the right fornix, and the cortical thickness of the right medial orbitofrontal cortex. In classification between ADHD-F and ADHD-NF, the highlighted features were the volume of the left cingulate cingulum tract, the volume of the right parietal segment of the superior longitudinal fasciculus, and the cortical thickness of the right fusiform cortex. Our binary hypothesis semi-supervised deep learning framework reliably separates familial and non-familial ADHD and shows that advanced semi-supervised deep learning techniques can deliver robust, generalizable neurobiological markers for neurodevelopmental disorders.

Identifiers

PMID40894124
PMCPMC12393642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.