Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894055›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Beyond Refractive Error: Myopia's Exponential Burden on Retinal Health with Each Diopter.

Leo Arnal, Yeabsira Mesfin, Christine Xu, Anish Salvi, Kapil Mishra, Chase A Ludwig

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leo ArnalByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Yeabsira MesfinUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine.
Christine XuByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Anish SalviByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Kapil MishraUniversity of California, Irvine School of Medicine.
Chase A LudwigByers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Myopic Vitreoretinal PathologyK23EY035741 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Chase Axel Ludwig · 2024 to 2026
$822k
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY035741NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As myopia reaches epidemic levels worldwide, its role in driving vision-threatening retinal complications is increasingly urgent. This study quantifies the burden of myopia by examining its association with key retinal diseases and how risk escalates with increasing severity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the STARR clinical data warehouse, including all patients with ≥1 documented eye visit. Myopia severity was defined by spherical equivalent and axial length, classifying patients as non-myopic, myopic, highly myopic, or severely myopic. Primary outcomes included six retinal diseases associated with myopia: choroidal neovascularization (CNV), myopic macular degeneration (MMD), foveoschisis, macular hole (MH), rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), and foveal retinal detachment (FRD). Adjusted logistic regression estimated odds by myopia severity and spherical equivalent. Mean age at diagnosis was compared across groups. Results: Retinal complications occurred at younger ages with increasing myopia severity. Compared to non-myopes, myopic, highly myopic, and severely myopic patients had 2.45 (95% CI: 2.36-2.55), 2.46 (95% CI: 2.31-2.62), and 8.15 (95% CI: 7.17-9.27) times higher odds, respectively, of developing any retinal complication. Per diopter increase in myopia, the odds of each complication increased: CNV (OR 1.11; 95% CI: 1.09-1.12), MMD (OR 1.22; 95% CI: 1.18-1.25), foveoschisis (OR 1.22; 95% CI: 1.16-1.28), MH (OR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.05-1.08), FRD (OR 1.23; 95% CI: 1.16-1.32), and RRD (OR 1.10; 95% CI: 1.10-1.11). In severe myopes, odds were markedly elevated: CNV (OR 22.90), MMD (OR 60.19), foveoschisis (OR 102.98), MH (OR 6.69), FRD (OR 22.72), and RRD (OR 6.84). Conclusions: Myopia is independently associated with higher odds of retinal diseases, and this risk increases incrementally with severity. These findings support a dose-response relationship and highlight the importance of early risk stratification, tailored monitoring, and timely referral in patients with high and severe myopia.

Indexed as

choroidal neovascularizationfoveal retinal detachmentfoveoschisismacular holemyopiamyopic macular degenerationretinarhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Identifiers

PMID40894055
PMCPMC12393500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.