Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40894039›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Efficacy of 5×5 accelerated versus conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant depression.

Michael Apostol, Thomas Valles, Juliana Corlier, Michael Leuchter, Alexander Young, Hewa Artin, Ralph Koek, Evan Einstein, Scott Wilke, Reza Tadayonnejad and 8 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Michael ApostolUniversity of California, Los Angeles.ORCID 0000-0002-6112-1012
Thomas VallesUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Juliana Corlier
Hewa Artin
Ralph Koek
Evan Einstein
Scott Wilke
Reza TadayonnejadUCLA.ORCID 0000-0002-4665-6721
Hanadi Oughli
Thomas Strouse
Margaret Distler
Dustin DeYoung
Nathaniel Ginder
David KrantzUCLA.
Andrew LeuchterUCLA.

Funding

Resonant Frequency rTMS: A Novel Approach to Target Circuit Modulation in MDDR01MH135293 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LINDA L CARPENTER, ANDREW F LEUCHTER · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
Multi-target repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and comorbid painK01MH123887 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Juliana Corlier · 2022 to 2026
$732k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH123887NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH135293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), with an FDA-cleared protocol utilizing 10 sessions of prolonged intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (piTBS) per day for five days. However, it remains unclear how many sessions and pulses are necessary to achieve benefit. We examined efficacy of five stimulation sessions per day for five days ("5×5") of either piTBS or individualized, electroencephalogram-based "resonant frequency" (RF) stimulation. We compared MDD symptom improvement (PHQ-9) between two groups: 1) accelerated patients (N = 40) undergoing 5×5 treatment (patients received piTBS or RF rTMS) and 2) conventional patients (N = 135) receiving standard once daily rTMS. Both protocols ameliorated MDD symptoms and there were no statistically significant differences in depression symptom changes (p = .07) between the accelerated 5×5 protocol (mean PHQ-9: pre-rTMS = 17.68, post-rTMS = 10.98) and conventional once-daily treatment (mean PHQ-9: pre-rTMS = 17.83, post-rTMS = 8.97). There was no significant difference in improvement between the piTBS and RF 5×5 protocols (p = 0.9). A PHQ-9 median split of 5×5 patients revealed that the top half of patients showed robust depression improvement (69%) while the bottom half received no significant benefit (8%) by day 5. However, the bottom half showed significant improvement (36%) at two-to-four-week follow up (p = 0.001). These results suggest 5×5 accelerated rTMS treatment is as effective as once daily rTMS treatment and that the efficacy of accelerated treatment may not be accurately assessed until weeks after treatment completion.

Identifiers

PMID40894039
PMCPMC12393489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.