ArticleResearch square2025
Spatiotemporal asymmetries on brain energy landscape uncover system entrapment related to depression severity.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate the spatiotemporal organization of resting-state brain activity in individuals with and without major depressive disorder (MDD), identifying stable and recurring whole-brain functional co-activation patterns that serve as attractor-like configurations. A particularly prominent brain state, marked by suppressed default mode and frontoparietal networks and heightened salience system engagement, occurring more frequently and with shorter dwell times in MDD and correlating with greater anhedonia severity. Transition dynamics further reveal that MDD participants exhibit reduced transitions between visual-attentional and limbic-default mode systems, which is associated with higher overall depression symptoms, suggestive of affective and cognitive rigidity. By evaluating the dynamic properties in relation to white matter architecture, we find that MDD individuals preferentially transition along energetically costly trajectories, particularly from salience-reactive to introspective states, despite the presence of structurally facilitated alternatives, implicating inefficient structure-function coupling. Finally, characterizing the energetic asymmetries of entry and exit transitions uncovers the landscape on which the brain travels between source- and sink-like attractors, with MDD dynamics disproportionately becoming trapped between a local maximum and a deep basin. These results offer a mechanistic account of how depression may emerge from maladaptive state trajectories within an energetically imbalanced neural landscape.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.