ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2025
BAYESIAN DATA AUGMENTATION FOR RECURRENT EVENTS UNDER INTERMITTENT ASSESSMENT IN OVERLAPPING INTERVALS WITH APPLICATIONS TO EMR DATA.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BAYESIAN DATA AUGMENTATION FOR RECURRENT EVENTS UNDER INTERMITTENT ASSESSMENT IN OVERLAPPING INTERVALS WITH APPLICATIONS TO EMR DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic medical records (EMR) data contain rich information that can facilitate health-related studies but is collected primarily for purposes other than research. For recurrent events, EMR data often do not record event times or counts but only contain intermittently assessed and censored observations (i.e. upper and/or lower bounds for counts in a time interval) at uncontrolled times. This can result in non-contiguous or overlapping assessment intervals with censored event counts. Existing methods for analyzing intermittently assessed recurrent events assume disjoint assessment intervals with known counts (interval count data) due to a focus on prospective studies with controlled assessment times. We propose a Bayesian data augmentation method to analyze the complicated assessments in EMR data for recurrent events. Within a Gibbs sampler, event times are imputed by generating sets of event times from non-homogeneous Poisson processes and rejecting proposed sets that are incompatible with constraints imposed by assessment data. Based on the independent increments property of Poisson processes, we implement three techniques to speed up this rejection sampling imputation method for large EMR datasets: independent sampling by partitioning, truncated generation, and sequential sampling. In a simulation study we show our method accurately estimates parameters of log-linear Poisson process intensities. Although the proposed method can be applied generally to EMR data of recurrent events, our study is specifically motivated by identifying risk factors for falls due to cancer treatment and its supportive medications. We used the proposed method to analyze an EMR dataset comprising 5501 patients treated for breast cancer. Our analysis provides evidence supporting associations between certain risk factors (including classes of medications) and risk of falls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.