ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2025
Midwives' knowledge and diagnostic practices for mastitis and breast cancer in breastfeeding women in Japan: A cross-sectional study.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionJapanese midwives support lactating women to continue breastfeeding. However, midwives often learn breast care methods through practical experience. This study investigated how midwives acquire knowledge about mastitis and breast cancer.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in Japan over two months. The study participants were midwives with breast care experience. The questionnaire was sent to 800 midwifery facilities for recruitment. The questions covered learning and diagnostic methods for general breast care, bacterial mastitis, severe mastitis, and breast cancer during lactation. The analysis method involved descriptive statistics. An Ethical Review Committee approved this study.
resultsThe survey return rate was 27.50% (n=200). The valid response rate was 87.27% (n=192). Although the learning method that helped midwives most regarding mastitis, in general, was breast care experience (38.0%), knowledge about bacterial mastitis and severe mastitis came from advice from doctors or senior midwives (33.3%, 42.4%). However, knowledge about breast cancer during lactation was mostly learned during formal education (29.5%); many had never learned about it (10.5%). The most common method used by midwives to make breast care decisions was subjective judgment.
conclusionsMost midwives learned a great deal by observing and palpating actual breasts in clinical settings. Some midwives had learned very little about breast cancer. Most midwives did not use medical equipment for breast evaluations. This suggests that Japanese midwives have high breast care skills. However, there is room for improving midwives' skills in using medical equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.