ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Neural basis of linguistic factors involved in thought: an fMRI study with native signers.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linguistic factors are critically involved in our conscious thinking processes, but neuroscientific evidence of their involvement is scant. To examine commonalities that underlie reasoning and language tasks, we prepared illustrative quizzes under five conditions in a Reasoning task: Context, Fill-in, Rotation, Sequence, and Analogy. These conditions differentially involved linguistic factors of the recursive, propositional, and clausal, as well as non-linguistic factors. We also used story videos in Japanese Sign Language (JSL) in a Sign task as a language comprehension task. Brain activations measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were examined for native JSL signers, with the following results. First, in the comparison of the Context condition with the Fill-in condition, which controlled non-linguistic factors, multiple bilateral regions were activated, including language areas such as the left lateral premotor cortex (L. LPMC) and left inferior frontal gyrus (L. IFG). By using conjunction and region of interest analyses, we clarified two distinct systems, which were differentially recruited under the Sequence and Analogy conditions: the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.