SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Psychological resources and interventions for teachers' emotional competence and well-being: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching Under Fire: A Cross-Sectional Study of Dispositional and Life-Stage Correlates of Perceived Resilience Among Israeli Educators Under Missile Threat.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Psychology of Fair Assessment: Mindfulness, Mental Health, and Grading Bias Among Senior High School Teachers in Ghana.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Emotional-Social Intelligence Profiles and Adaptive Professional Functioning Among Teachers: A Person-Centered Analysis of School Climate Perception and Conflict Handling.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Article
- The effects of preschool teacher's perceived social support on autonomous motivation in China: the mediating role of emotional competence.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Reducing teachers' perceived stress through an online wellbeing intervention: the role of socio-emotional competence and self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Teachers are increasingly exposed to emotional and organizational stressors that affect their psychological well-being and professional functioning. Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Reflective Functioning (RF) have emerged as key protective factors in preventing burnout and promoting Quality of Life (QoL) in educational contexts. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and synthesized findings from 42 empirical studies published between 2010 and 2024. Studies were identified through comprehensive searches of EBSCOhost, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Both psychological interventions and observational studies exploring the relationship between EI, RF, and teacher well-being were included. Results: Intervention studies showed that programs targeting emotional regulation, mindfulness, and reflective capacity significantly improved teachers' emotional competencies and psychological resilience. Observational studies further supported the role of EI and RF in reducing burnout and enhancing QoL, while also highlighting the influence of personality traits and contextual moderators. However, methodological heterogeneity, limited use of longitudinal designs, and variation in outcome measures constrained generalizability. Discussion: Findings underscore the importance of promoting psychological resources and structured interventions to support teachers' emotional well-being and professional sustainability. Future research should prioritize standardized, longitudinal, and culturally sensitive approaches to better inform evidence-based practice in educational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.