ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Exploring the determinants of subjective well-being among the elderly in Dongguan: a qualitative comparison of migrant and local residents.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to explore the determinants of subjective well-being among elderly populations in Dongguan, one of China's most rapidly industrializing cities, with a particular focus on differences between migrant and native elderly residents. Methods/analysis: A qualitative research design was employed. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 38 elderly participants (26 native and 12 migrant residents) in Tangxia Town, Dongguan City. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis supported by NVivo software, and participant recruitment was conducted through purposive and snowball sampling until data saturation was reached. Findings: Five main themes influencing subjective well-being emerged: physical condition, family relationships, basic living conditions, environmental adaptation, and life security. Health and family reunification were universally regarded as critical to well-being. While both groups reported positive well-being, migrant elderly experienced more barriers in medical insurance coverage and lower engagement in social activities, contributing to relatively lower satisfaction. Native elderly, in contrast, benefited more from established social networks and local policy support. Novelty/improvement: Unlike previous studies that focus predominantly on migrant workers or treat elderly populations as a homogeneous group, this study offers a comparative lens on migrant and native elderly, revealing unique challenges faced by migrant elders in urban environments. The findings highlight the need for more inclusive social participation opportunities and portable medical insurance policies to improve the well-being of migrant elderly in rapidly urbanizing areas. This study contributes empirical evidence to inform aging-related policy development under China's demographic transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.