ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The link between non-routine problem solving success levels and strategic flexibility of gifted fourth-grade students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mathematical cognitive structures in Grade 12 students: a mixed-methods concept map study of gender differences and computational ability.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this correlational study is to explore how success levels in solving non-routine problems among gifted fourth-grade students are linked to their strategic flexibility. Methods: Data were gathered from 165 gifted fourth-grade students at a Science and Art Center in Bursa/Türkiye. Binary logistic regression was employed to assess the impact of gender and various indicators of strategic flexibility on success levels in non-routine problem solving. Results: The findings reveal that these students perform exceptionally well in both non-routine problem solving and strategic flexibility. The most commonly used strategies among students are "drawing figures or diagrams", "reasoning", and "working backward." The strategic flexibility indicators with the highest average usage are "selection of the appropriate strategy", "strategy knowledge", and "changing strategies when encountering different problems". A significant and strong correlation was observed between their success in non-routine problem solving and strategic flexibility. Within the regression model, the ability to "select appropriate strategies" emerged as a significant predictor of performance in non-routine problem solving among gifted students. Discussion: In summary, this study highlights the problem solving strategies used by gifted students in non-routine problems, and the indicators of strategic flexibility that are effective in predicting success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.