ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Change trajectory of dyadic coping and subjective well-being in patients with malignant bone tumors based on cross-lagged panel model and latent growth model: a longitudinal study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant bone tumors can result in physical disability, which has a significant impact on the quality of patients' survival. Additionally, patients often experience high levels of psychological distress. The subjective well-being of patients with bone tumors is low, and this low level of well-being is the direct cause of the accumulation of negative emotions and misanthropy in patients. Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the developmental trajectory of dyadic coping and subjective well-being in patients with malignant bone tumors, and to investigate the predictive relationship between the two. Furthermore, this study aims to provide a theoretical basis for improving the subjective well-being of patients with malignant bone tumors. Methods: A total of 265 patients with malignant bone tumors who were hospitalized in the Department of Orthopedics of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University in Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province from October 2021 to April 2024 were selected as the research subjects. Their dyadic coping and subjective well-being were tracked and examined at three time points: T1 (at the time of diagnosis), T2 (1 month after diagnosis), and T3 (3 months after diagnosis). The data were analyzed using a cross-lagged model and a latent variable growth model. Results: The cross-lagged modeling revealed that, on average, dyadic coping levels exhibited a significant and positive predictive relationship with subjective well-being at the subsequent node. Similarly, subjective well-being levels demonstrated a significant and positive predictive relationship with dyadic coping levels at the subsequent node. The latent variable growth model demonstrated an upward trajectory in dyadic coping (S = 0.228, Conclusion: The results demonstrated a notable increase in dyadic coping and subjective well-being in patients with malignant bone tumors from the time of diagnosis to 3 months post-diagnosis. Furthermore, there was a discernible correlation between dyadic coping and subjective well-being in patients with malignant bone tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.