Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40893821›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology2022

Sharing Information about Health-Related Resources: Observations from a Community Resource Referral Intervention Trial in a Predominantly African American/Black Community.

Stacy Tessler Lindau, Jennifer Makelarski, Emily Abramsohn, David G Beiser, Kelly Boyd, Elbert S Huang, Kelsey Paradise, Elizabeth L Tung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sounding out solutions: using SONAR to connect participants with relevant healthcare resources.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stacy Tessler LindauDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL USA.
Jennifer MakelarskiDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL USA.
Emily AbramsohnDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL USA.
David G BeiserDepartment of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL USA.
Kelly BoydDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL USA.
Elbert S HuangDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL USA.
Kelsey ParadiseDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL USA.
Elizabeth L TungDepartment of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL USA.

Funding

Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
CommunityRx-DementiaR01AG064949 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HUANG, ELBERT S., LINDAU, STACY TESSLER · 2019 to 2023
$4.0M
Evaluating a Self-Care Innovation for Older Adults using Agent-Based ModelingR01AG047869 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LINDAU, STACY TESSLER · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
CommunityRx for Hunger - Resubmission 01R01MD012630 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LINDAU, STACY TESSLER · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047869NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064949NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD012630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CommunityRx is a theory-driven, information technology (IT)-based intervention, developed with and in a predominantly African American/Black community, that provides patients with personalized information (a "HealtheRx") about self-management and social care resources in their community. We described patient and clinician information sharing after exposure to the intervention during a clinical trial. Survey data from 145 patients (ages 45-74) and 121 clinicians were analyzed. Of patients who shared information at least once (49%), 47% reported sharing ≥3 times (range 1-14). Patient sharers were in poorer physical health (mean PCS 37.6 vs 40.8, p=0.05) than non-sharers and more likely to report going to a resource on their HealtheRx (79% versus 41%, p≤0.05). Most patient sharers provided others a look at or copy of their HealtheRx, keeping the original. Patients used the HealtheRx to promote credibility of the information and communicate that resources were disease-specific and local. Half of clinicians shared HealtheRx resource information with peers; sharers were three times more likely than non-sharers to feel they were well-informed about resources to address social needs (55% versus 18%, p<0.01). Information sharing by clinicians and patients is an understudied mechanism that could amplify the effects of a growing class of community resource referral information technologies.

Indexed as

health information technologyhealth promotioninformation scienceinformation sharingself-managementsocial caresocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40893821
PMCPMC12395496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.